Constructive analysis is about understanding construction in thought and mind to concieve and achieve the objective goal of true, right and fair judgement. It is right to criticise when it is constructive criticism, however we first have to analyse our motives and requirements when evaluating someone elses work and efforts to be just fair and right ourselves when we so to do judge. Evaluation plays an important part in constructive analysis and the greater depth that we seek to uncover the facts, the better enabled and equiped we are to do so. Once again we must do this in the light of fairness and by being objective in mind and only criticise when need be as if there was a essential point missing out of the context. However as part of the evaluation process in anylitical thinking, we have to look first at the focus and then the depth of meaning and any reaction that will happen by the evaluation.This can be done and achieved by constructive evaluation and one should always try and highlight the good first before knit picking the bad and negative sides to the arguement. Having a structurally sound arguement is also an important part of the criteria and an experienced evaluation technique is required when assessing and making judgements in the given analytic situation. Before we can assess the subject of evaluation in constructive analysis, one must look at the heart of the problem to make accurate and fair conclusions, with right minded decisions in judgement on the given situation or analytical case. We all to often jump the gun in anylitic thinking by coming to hasty conclusions too soon before all the evidence and factual arguements are presented. We need to slow down and collect all the facts first before making any quick conclusions and by taking time and effort to then establish the right and wrong perspective of each case, in order to make a final selection and judgement correctly and accurately. It is fair to say that all judgements need to be judicially selective and second opinions are optimumly sought after, in difficult cases. The requirement of important decisions in selective cases highlights and implies more greater understanding and we should not hold back or be intimidated by wrongful suggestions, but take on board all possible scenarios and consider the objective outcomes should a particular critical path be chosen. By evaluationg the good and bad directions of the given possible path of procedure we can evaluate and analyse the outcome criteria and accepted end result. This is the purpose and reason for constructive analysis to forsee problem areas and then redirect and refocus efforts back into the right direction by chanelling efforts appropriately in the correct direction. This evaluation technique is the essential part of projection and must be highlighted to facilitate the best possible outcome for the case objective. Evaluation and review techniques for projection must be constantly observed to assess the possible outcome of the objective and any anyalitic evaluation if it is construcive must be authorised by sound judgement to be processed. So it is right and fair to say that constructive analysis is the creating of acheiveing the desired goal of objective setting and fullfilment when assessed correctly.